Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Note 6 - Income taxes

 v2.3.0.11
Note 6 - Income taxes
6 Months Ended
Jul. 03, 2011
Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]
 6.       Income taxes

During the three months ended July 3, 2011 and July 4, 2010, respectively, the Company recorded a net income tax expense of $127 and $85, primarily related to minimum taxes and taxes on profits in certain jurisdictions, combined with foreign exchange revaluation. During the six months ended July 3, 2011 and July 4, 2010, respectively, the Company recorded a net income tax expense of $333 and $165, primarily related to minimum taxes and taxes on profits in certain jurisdictions, combined with foreign exchange revaluation.

At January 2, 2011, the Company had total net operating loss (“NOL”) carry forwards of $101,311, which will expire in the years presented below:

2012
  $ 1,260  
2014
    10,278  
2015
    4,154  
2018
    1,078  
2019
    60  
2020
    30  
2021
    13,728  
2022
    16,207  
2023
    27,270  
2026-2029
    27,246  
    $ 101,311  

At July 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $340 and $330, respectively, which if recognized, would favorably impact the Company’s effective tax rate in future periods. The change during the period relates to foreign exchange revaluation of existing uncertain tax positions. The Company does not expect any of these unrecognized tax benefits to reverse in the next twelve months.

Tax years 2003 to 2010 remain open for review by tax authorities in Canada. Tax years 2004 and 2006 to 2010 remain open for review by tax authorities in the United States.

The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense based on the likelihood of the event and its ability to reasonably estimate such amounts. The Company has approximately $248 and $225 accrued for interest and penalties as of July 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011, respectively. The change is primarily due to the recording of incremental interest on existing uncertain positions for the period and foreign exchange revaluation.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, change of control limitations, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Guidance under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, “Income Taxes”, (“ASC 740”) states that forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative evidence, such as cumulative losses in recent years in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets relate. At the end of the second quarter of 2003, the Company concluded that given the weakness and uncertainty in the economic environment at that time, it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets. Commencing in 2004, it was determined by management that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets associated with the Mexican jurisdiction would be realized and no valuation allowance has been recorded against these deferred tax assets since 2004.  In 2010, it was determined by management that it was more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets associated with the U.S. jurisdiction would be realized and no valuation allowance has been recorded against these deferred tax assets. The Canadian jurisdiction continues to have a full valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax assets.